11 October 2024 | 08:46 AM

Judgement day for Jackie Selebi

Key Takeaways

The atmosphere was solemn in Court 4B of the South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg on Thursday as Judge Meyer Joffe started handing down judgement in the corruption trial of former top cop Jackie Selebi.

Thursday will see the end of Selebi’s harrowing trial, which has lasted eight months.

Microphones, cameras and video cameras were allowed into court for the first time in the trial. Files piled waist-high stood next to Joffe’s chair, indicating a lengthy judgement. The public gallery was the fullest it had been since the first day of the trial.

Joffe immediately plunged into the charges of corruption and defeating the ends of justice.

According to the state: “The accused is a public officer. A relationship developed between a Mr Glenn Agliotti and the accused. This relationship became a generally corrupt relationship — The accused received gifts of money and clothing — the accused shared information with Agliotti — protected Agliotti from criminal investigations.”

Joffe then ran through Selebi’s plea of not guilty to all charges. “In essence the accused denied all allegations against him — and claimed this prosecution was done with an ulterior motive.”

‘Generally corrupt relationship’

The state claims that Selebi took more than R1,2-million from drug dealer Agliotti, and received expensive gifts of clothing, in what was a “generally corrupt relationship”. Selebi is also accused of defeating the ends of justice by showing Agliotti secret police reports.

The trial has been dramatic — Agliotti cried on the stand when talking about the pain he felt at testifying against his “friend”, and Selebi was accused of creating “cut and paste documents” to show in court.

Joffe has had a fraught relationship with both state prosecutor Gerrie Nel and defence counsel Jaap Cilliers, sometimes struggling to hide his agitation at Nel’s fumbles, and “taking umbrage” with Cilliers’s regular protests.

‘Lying witness’

While the defence claimed that Agliotti, the state’s main witness, was “untruthful” and obsessed with self-progress, the state accused Selebi of being a “lying witness”.

Selebi changed his versions before the court several times and met with a state witness while the state was still presenting its case. This led to a distant relationship between Selebi and his counsel, with Cilliers ultimately abandoning Selebi’s evidence in his closing arguments.

Cilliers, claiming that Selebi was the victim of a “malicious prosecution”, maintains that Selebi never received a single payment from Agliotti.

However, the state’s strongest witness, Agliotti’s former fiancée Dianne Muller, says she witnessed money changing hands between Selebi and Agliotti, which was contained in a brown paper bag.

Thursday will show who and what Joffe believes to be true — if he thinks that Selebi accepted only a single payment from Agliotti, then he may find Selebi guilty. In one ear will be the voice of Cilliers, exclaiming: “Rather let a hundred guilty persons walk away than let one innocent person land in jail.” In the other will be Nel: “The accused’s version weighs nothing, because there is no version”.

Share this story:

INVESTIGATOR:

amaBhungane

Before joining the amaBhungane team in 2017, Micah was the national coordinator for media freedom and diversity at the Right2Know Campaign. He holds a Masters in African Studies from Oxford University and a BA Honours in History from Wits University.

Your identity is safe with us. Email or Call us

KNOW MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS STORY OR ANOTHER?

Related Stories